Death Therapy

When I hear that someone has been given multiple life sentences as punishment for a crime, I ask myself what the difference is between one life sentence and five life sentences.  I understand there is symbolism in the additional sentences; and in some cases people with a "life sentence" may be released early. Regardless, would there be a way for multiple life sentences to actually be carried out?  Perhaps the sentence could mandate killing the criminal and then resuscitating them again, only to kill them again and then resuscitate them.  The process could be repeated enough times that a criminal could serve 5 life sentences in the course of a month.  (No, I'm not a lawyer, I just think like one sometimes.)

A new book by a doctor who specializes in resuscitation suggests that there is a common experience of dying that is consistent across cultures.  To be considered "dead", one's heart has to stop beating.  This stops brain activity, but it does not mean the the brain cells have died.  In fact, it is possible for a body to be chilled, and the person to be resuscitated several hours later.

erasing-death_custom-8059bea0f41cae8557dc09caefa74efd4471331a-s2

Upon regaining consciousness, many patients have no memory; but others report seeing a bright light and feeling a very loving presence.  They recall having their life reviewed with them and feeling pain as they recall times when they caused others pain.  Some patients even report being inspired to try to do better with their new lives.

So perhaps instead of giving our prisoners a lethal injection, we could give them "death therapy".

I also can imagine many wealthy people would pay for such an experience, assuming that the resuscitation is perfected, so that the risk of staying dead is minimal.

2013/04/10   # Permalink

The Temptation of Jesus, Mercedes edition

Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the Desert to be tempted by the devil. After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. The tempter came to him and said, “If you are the Son of God, tell the stones to become bread.”

Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.”

Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. ”If you are the Son of God, he said. “throw yourself down. For it is written:

“He will comand his angles concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.”

Jesus answered him, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’”

Then the devil showed him the new Mercedes CLA, and all the fame and glamour that it would bring, saying, “Sign your soul over to me and all this is yours.”

As Jesus was carefully considering the devil’s offer, he saw the CLA’s price of only $29,900 and said, “Thanks, I think I got this.”

2013/02/16   # Permalink

2013 Resolution: Increase my Reading Quality

This is the time of the year when sites around the web compile "best of" lists, as a way of reflecting on the past year.  It's one of the few times we reflect on which of the many messages we've been drowning in will have lasting significance -- what messages are more than just noise.

In 2010, Robin Sloan wrote an article that provides a useful vocabulary for thinking about creating and consuming content in a world with 24/7 news, endless facebook updates, and twitter.

Robin introduces the terms "stock" and "flow":

There are two kinds of quantities in the world. Stock is a static value: money in the bank, or trees in the forest. Flow is a rate of change: fifteen dollars an hour, or three thousand toothpicks a day..

I actually think stock and flow is the master metaphor for media today. Here’s what I mean:

  • Flow is the feed. It’s the posts and the tweets. It’s the stream of daily and sub-daily updates that remind people that you exist.
  • Stock is the durable stuff. It’s the content you produce that’s as interesting in two months (or two years) as it is today. It’s what people discover via search. It’s what spreads slowly but surely, building fans over time.
Havasu Falls

I feel like flow is ascendant these days, for obvious reasons—but we neglect stock at our own peril. I mean that both in terms of the health of an audience and, like, the health of a soul. Flow is a treadmill, and you can’t spend all of your time running on the treadmill. Well, you can. But then one day you’ll get off and look around and go: Oh man. I’ve got nothing here.

So what are the ways that I can increase my ratio of stock to flow?

Zucherburg's Law

Mark Zuckerberg, of Facebook believes that every year people will share twice as much information as they did the previous year, so they've developed tools to help their users cope.

You can choose to subscribe only to what is most important and you can filter out messages from people you know less well.  It would be nice if there were a service I could subscribe to which could dial back the level of flow and receive a greater quantity of stock on the web. Monthly magazines are supposed to serve this function.  Or I can just go to the library and find some classic books.

So for 2013, my resolution is to increase the quality of what I read -- more stock and less flow.

2012/12/31   # Permalink

Financial Reform Videos

I've been reading a lot about financial reform.  Here are a few videos on the subject:

1) Inside Job

Katie Couric interviews Charles Fergueson, creator of "Inside Job"

2) The Warning: PBS Frontline Documentary

Long before the meltdown, one woman tried to warn about a threat to the financial system

Watch The Warning on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

  2012/01/15   # Permalink

How would Frank Luntz frame Warren Buffett's Tax Debate?

The Secretary-Billionaire Tax Equality Principle

Warren Buffett wrote an op-ed recently that suggested that the top 0.3% of yearly earners were paying too little in taxes. One of his favorite illustrations of this point is that his secretary pays a much higher tax rate that he does.

His prescription is:

  • undefined cuts to entitlement programs
  • higher taxes on the top 0.3%

The Power of Framing

The idea that a secretary should not pay a higher tax rate than their billionaire boss is hard to argue with and shows the power of "framing".

Here's an other tax framing idea:

It is often said that we don't want to push the burden of current spending onto future generations.

Reihan Salam: During the Bush years, it was often said that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts represented redistribution from future taxpayers to current taxpayers.

You might reframe this as:

Those older Americans, who can afford it, should not get a better deal their grandchildren's generation

But how would Frank Luntz say it?

Related

2011/08/20   # Permalink

Featured Items

Death Therapy

The Temptation of Jesus, Remixed

The Temptation of Jesus, Mercedes edition

2013 Resolution: Stock & Flow

2013 Resolution: Increase my Reading Quality

Financial Reform Videos

Multi-Resolution Blog Template

The Buffet Rule

Warren Buffet's Tax Debage

Multi-Resolution Blog Template

Multi-Resolution Blog Template

Better metric: Gallons per 10K Miles

Cadillac Escalade

Optimistic Assets: The Banking Crisis

Photo: Ice Berg

Embedded Video goes Viral

Video: Simpsons' Forclosure

Top of the Dropdown

Screenshot: Dropdown List Box

Credit Crisis: Cash Advances

Photo: Credit Cards

The 1 Percent Doctrine

Image: Blaise Pascal

Supply-Sided Environmentalism

Graph: Energy Savings

Is Oil A National Security Issue?

James Baker: Interview on Charlie Rose

Bike Light Review: Dinotte 600L

Dinotte 600L Bike Light

This Headline Suggested by Google

Pear Lake, Sequoia National Park, California

Quoting Google Video

Alberto Gonzalez: Interview on Charlie Rose

Google China: A very different image

Photo: Tiananmen Sqaure

Subscribe